Marks and Spencer Business and Financial Performance Analysis

Marks and Spencer Business and Financial Performance Analysis Marks and Spencer is a British retail giant specialised in apparel and food industry. The company had been in its business for more than hundred years and has the biggest market capitalisation in the retail industry. This research is conducted to measure and analyse the business and financial performance of the company. Business performance is measured in this study considering the opportunities and constraints in company macroeconomic and industry circumstances. Financial performance had been measured using ratios on profitability, liquidity, efficiency and leverage. There performance of MS is then compared with the financial performance of Next Group, the next biggest player in British retail industry. The study found that, although MS has many business successes over the years, it had been performing financially poorer than Next Group and needs emergency improvement in its liquidity. The study recommends Marks and Spencer to rethink its leverage strategy and exploit the benefit of debt as like Next Group. Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Study Background Marks and Spencer is one of the largest retailers in UK specialised in clothes and foods with a market capitalization of more than  £6400 million1. We have over 700 stores located throughout the UK and Republic of Ireland; this includes our largest store at Marble Arch, London. In addition, the company has over 300 stores worldwide, operating in more than 40 territories2. In 2010 the companys sales revenue from general merchandise was  £4.1 billion and  £4.3 billion from foods. Its nearest competitor Next, which has a market capitalisation of around  £4100 million1, had a turnover of  £3.41 million in 2010 with a market share of 8.3% in comparison to 11% by Marks and Spencer in general merchandise segment. This study is particularly concerned with the business and financial performances of Marks and Spencer which are compared with the performances of Next. 1.2 Study Objectives The prime objective of this research is to analyse and evaluate the key business and financial performances of British retail giant Marks Spencer from year 2007 to 2010. While achieving this objective the research will try to meet the following secondary objectives 1.2.1 Analyse the major business performances of the company over last three years: The study will examine the companys performances in major business areas including its growth, market share, competitive position in the whole macro environment and major strengths over its competitors. 1.2.2 Identify and analyse the measures key financial performances: The second objective of the study is to identify the measures of companys financial performances especially in profitability, liquidity, investment and leverage performances. Besides this operational performances in other areas would be identified and anlaysed under this objective. 1.2.3 Compare the performances against Next: The third objective of the study is to compare the financial performances of M S with the performances of Next, the nearest competitor in general retail section. 1.2.4 Identify the major problems of Marks Spencer in business and financial performances and provide recommendations: Finally the study will try to identify the major weaknesses of Marks Spencers based on the measures of business and financial performances. The research will also formulate 1.3 Study Scopes and Usefulness of the Study Scope of this research work is three years (2007-2010) business and financial performances of Marks and Spencer. The scope also includes financial performance of Next for the same period. The findings of the study can be useful information for investors. The method used by the study can be a guide for the business and financial analysts. 1.4 Research Structure The research paper is structured in line with the sequence of objectives. The first chapter includes the rationale and objectives of the study. Then relevant literatures and theoretical issues are discussed in chapter two. The third chapter will present the methods of conducting this research work. Companys business performances and financial performances would be presented consecutively in chapter four and five. In chapter six Marks and Spencers performance will be compared with Nexts performance and areas of improvement for M S would be identified. Finally in chapter six recommendations would be provided with final remarks. Chapter 2 Literature Review 2.1 Introduction As discussed earlier, this research work is concerned with the business and financial performance of Marks and Spencer. This chapter will narrate an overview of the business operation of the company. This chapter will also review the techniques of measuring business and financial performance especially using qualitative and quantitative techniques along with brief interpretation of the performance measures. 2.2 Marks and Spencer: An Overview Marks and Spencer is a FTSE 100 company with the largest revenue base of more than  £8 billion as a retailer. It is headquartered in City of Westminster, London having operation in more than 40 countries. The following section provides a brief discussion on companys history, main line of business, geographical spread, summary of financial performances, its corporate social responsibility and the management. 2.2.1 Corporate History Marks and Spencer was established in 1884 by Michael Marks and Thomas Spencer3. The company had a policy of selling only British-made goods which made it popular in early 20th century. It started its apparel brand St Michael in 1928 and in 1950 St Margaret label was introduced for woman clothing. The company started its international expansion in 1970s by putting its step in central Europe and Ireland. During its hundred years of lifetime the company became the pioneer in quality management, customer relationships, health and safety and energy efficiency. The companys performance briefly slumped during the first decade of new millennium. However, the company is back to profit and growth in 2010 under the strong leadership of Marc Bolland who joined the company as CEO in May 2010. 2.2.2 Core UK Businesses M Ss core UK businesses include general merchandise and foods. It is largest clothing retailer including womenswear, lingerie and menswear and kidswear. Last year the companys turnover in general merchandise was  £4.1 billion which constituted an stunning 11% of the overall market share. Marks and Spencer is also the leading provider of high quality food, selling everything from fresh produce and groceries, to partly-prepared meals and ready meals and an award winning range of wines. Turnover from foods was  £4.3 billion in 2010 with a modest market share of 3%. 2.2.3 Sales Channel Customers shop with MS in many ways in stores, online or over the phone (MS Annual Report, 2010). The company has 690 stores across the UK. Its shops are located in convenient locations from high streets to retail parks, train stations to airports. Over the past four years the company has transformed these stores into bright and contemporary destinations with a range of hospitality options. The company also sells online which it calls MS Direct. MS Direct is a platform for improving customer convenience and service including via its website and newly launched Shop Your Way facility. The company aims to achieve £500m in sales through MS Direct by 2010/11. 2.2.4 International Business MS has 320 owned and franchised stores in 41 countries. The companys mix of ownership models and countries enabled it to perform well over the past year even when individual markets were weak. In 2010 its international turnover was  £949 million which is more than 15% of its overall revenue. 2.2.5 Recent Business and Financial Performances In 2010 the companys sales were up by 3.2% despite recessionary pressure. The overall gross margin was 41.2% with sales revenue  £9.3 billion. The company significantly improved its cost by saving  £145 million. The company reduced its capital expenditure cash outflow and generated a cash inflow of  £412m after tax and dividend. However, the companys market share was slightly down from 4.3% to 3.9%. Average visit to MS shops had been estimated around 21 million and average mystery shopper score was found to be stunning 89% in 2010. 2.2.6 About Next: The Nearest Competitor NEXT is the second largest UK based retailer offering clothing, footwear, accessories and home products. It distributes through three main channels: NEXT Retail, a chain of more than 500 stores in the UK and Eire, NEXT Directory, a home shopping catalogue and website with nearly 3 million active customers, and NEXT International, with more than 180 stores around the world. In 2010 the company had overall revenue of  £3.4 with a profit after tax of  £400 million. 2.3 Techniques of Measuring Business Performances A companys business can be analysed using various tools like PESTLE, SWOT analysis and Porters five force models. Measures of business performance might be companys expansion rate, revenue growth, development of strength, management of weaknesses and exploitation of opportunities etc. These measures can be achieved by subjective analysis and using business analysis tools. A brief discussion on these tools is presented as below. 2.3.1 PESTLE Analysis PESTLE, which is a popular macro-environmental analysis tool, stands for Political, Economic, Social, Technical, Legal, and Environmental analysis. Political factors include governments tax policy, employment and environmental law, trades and tariffs regulation, and political stability. Common Economic factors are GDP growth, nominal interest rates, exchange and the inflation rate. Key social factors are population growth, age distribution, health consciousness, religious views and career attitudes etc. Technological factors are spread and dependence on technology, innovation, research, and technological change etc. Legal factors are laws on discrimination, consumer, heath and safety law etc. Finally environmental factors include weather, climate, climate change etc. 2.3.2 Porters Five Force Model The five forces model is an industry analysis tool and provides a good idea of how a business should perform inside an industry. The model analyses five industry variables. These variables are ease of getting entry into industry, availability and potentiality of substitute products, suppliers and customers bargaining power and degree of competition in the industry. These factors determine how attractive and profitable an industry might be. 2.3.3 SWOT Analysis PESTLE and Porters models are used to analyse a companys macro and industry environment. SWOT Analysis is used for measuring a companys internal strengths and weaknesses. It also helps to identify specific opportunities and threats to company from the macro environment. 2.4 Techniques of Measuring Financial Performances Generally, financial performances are measured using the financial information of a company. Practically, ratio analyses are conducted on financial statement figures. Financial statements include companys income statement, balance sheet, statement of cash flow and statement of equity. There are several types of ratios profitability, liquidity, efficiency, gearing, and investor ratios. In following sections these groups of ratios are briefly discussed 2.4.1 Profitability Ratios These ratios are also called performance ratios where profit at different levels are compared with other figures and expressed in percentage. These ratios are (a) Gross Profit Margin: Gross profit margin is found by dividing gross profit by sales turnover and the formula looks like following The ratio can be a good indicator of companys direct cost or cost of sales. Profitability of a company in its core operation can be determined using this ratio. The higher the ratio the better it is. (b) Operating Profit Margin: Operating profit margin is found by dividing net profit by sales turnover and the formula looks like following As operating profit is found by deducting indirect expenses from gross profit, the ratio shows how much a company spends on non-direct activities. Too much cost on indirect cost might result in lower or negative operating profit margin. (c) Return on Capital: Shareholders and debt investors generally count profit on their investments. Return on capital can be calculated using the following formulas This ratio (ROCE) provides percentage return on the overall funds invested in the business. There is another ratio that provides return on stockholders equity which is called Return on Equity (ROE). The formula is as following ROE measures the profitability of the fund provided by the companys owners or shareholders. Profit margins and return on capital ratios together gives a good idea of overall profitability of the firm. A company having very good profit margin may have a poor ROCE or ROE ratio. Such cases happen when companies large investment operates in small scale or during the initial years. 2.4.2 Liquidity Ratios These are also known as solvency ratios, as they refer to the ability of the business to pay its payables in the short term. There are two main liquidity ratios. (a) Current Ratio: This is also known as the working capital ratio, as it is based on working capital or net current assets. It is calculated as: Current ratio is a measure of the liquidity of a business that compares its current assets with those payables due to be paid within 1 year of the statement of financial position date (otherwise known as current liabilities). (b) Quick Ratio: This is also known as the acid test ratio and is calculated as following This is similar to the current ratio, but takes the more prudent view that inventories may take some time to convert into cash, and therefore the true liquidity position is measured by the relationship of receivables and cash only to current liabilities. 2.4.3 Efficiency Ratios These ratios are also referred to as use of assets ratios. They measure the efficiency of the management of assets, both non-current and current. (a) Asset Turnover Ratio: These ratios compare the assets with the sales revenue (turnover) that they have earned. The end result is often expressed in money value to represent the value of sales revenue for each $1 invested in those assets. The formula is: (b) Inventory Days: Inventories may be analysed by calculating the ratio of inventories to cost of sales, and then multiplying by the number of days in a year to give inventories days. The formula is as following This figure gives the number of days that on average an item is in inventories before it is sold; this may alternatively be expressed as the number of days a firm could continue trading if the supply of goods ceased. (c) Receivable Days: This is a measure of the average time taken by customers to settle their debts. It is calculated by: As with inventories days, a slowing down in the speed of collecting debts will have a detrimental effect on cash flow. On the other hand, it may be that the business has deliberately offered extended credit in order to increase demand. (d) Payable Days: This is a measure of the average time taken to pay suppliers. Although it is not strictly a measure of asset efficiency on its own, it is part of the overall management of net current assets. It is calculated by: The result of this ratio can also be compared with the receivables days. A firm does not normally want to offer its customers more time to pay than it gets from its own suppliers, otherwise this could affect cash flow. Generally, the longer the payables payment period, the better, as the firm holds on to its cash for longer, but care must be taken not to upset suppliers by delaying payment, which could result in the loss of discounts and reliability. It is important to recognise when using these ratios that it is the trend of ratios that is important, not the individual values. Payment periods are longer in some types of organisation than in others. 2.4.4 Capital Structure Ratios Different firms have different methods of financing their activities. Some rely mainly on the issue of share capital and the retention of profits; others rely heavily on loan finance; most have a combination of the two. (a) The Gearing Ratio/Leverage Ratio: Gearing is a measure of the relationship between the amounts of finance provided by external parties (e.g. debentures) to the total capital employed. It is calculated by: The more highly geared a business, the more profits that have to be earned to pay the interest cost of the borrowing. Consequently, the higher the gearing, the more risky is the owners investment. On the other hand, a highly geared company might be more attractive to shareholders when profits are rising, because there are fewer of them to share out those profits. (b) Interest Cover: Connected to the gearing ratio is a measure of the number of times that the profit is able to cover the fixed interest due on long-term loans. It provides lenders with an idea of the level of security for the payment. The formula is: 2.5 Using Ratio Analysis Calculating the ratios is only one step in the analysis process. Once that is done, the results must be compared with other results. Comparison is commonly made between: Previous accounting periods; Other companies (perhaps in the same type of business); Budgets and expectations; Government statistics; Other ratios. 2.6 Conclusion This chapter gave brief overview of Marks and Spencer and also the tools and ratios that will be used to analyse the business and financial performances the company. The same ratios will be used to compare the performance of MS with Next. The next chapter will provide a brief overview on the research methodology and data that will be used for the research. Chapter 3 Research Methodology 3.1 Introduction Methodology may be defined as procedures that are used to conduct a function or activity. This chapter will briefly discuss on the methodology that will be used to analyse the business and financial performance of Marks and Spencer and comparing its performance with that of Next Inc. This section will also provide an overview of the data used in this study and their sources. 3.3 Required Data, Sources and Collection Methods Data required for completion of this research work are of secondary nature. Mark Spencers business related information were collected from companys website and annual reports of three years 2007, 2008 and 2009. Annual reports were collected from company website. The data required for macro-environmental analysis were collected from various articles, national statistical websites and newspapers. Financial information required for analysing financial performances are extracted from the annual reports of the company. Financial information of Next was collected in the same way. Findings of financial performance analysis are then used to identify the areas of improvement for MS. 3.4 Research Methodology Various quantitative and qualitative methods had been used to achieve the objectives these research. The nature of the methodologies are briefly discussed as following 3.4.1 Method for Analysing Business Performances: Method used for this purpose is qualitative. PESTLE analysis had been used for analysing the business performance in macro-environment. Porters model were used for analysing industry performance and position of MS. Finally, SWOT analysis was used to find out company specific opportunities and threats and companys key strengths and weaknesses. (See Chapter One to have idea of these tools). 3.4.2 Methods Used for Analysing and Comparing Financial Performances: Financial ratio analysis (discussed in chapter 1) is used to analyse the companys performance in profitability, liquidity, efficiency and leverage. The values of these ratios are compared against the ratios of Next to compare the performances of two companies. For presentation of findings different types of charts were used. 3.4.3 Methods of Identifying Improvement Areas: Areas of improvement would be identified using the findings of financial performance analysis using ratios. The areas where Next is performing better than MS would be identified as areas of improvements. After identifying areas of improvement strategy would be formulated to eliminate problem areas in companys financial performances. 3.4.4 Research and Data Analysis Tools Microsoft Excel 2007, which is a popular spreadsheet application, is used for conducting the ratio analysis and presenting findings of analysis graphically. 3.5 Conclusion This chapter provided a brief overview of the research data, methods and tools used in this research. In next, chapter the findings of the research would be presented followed analysis of findings. Chapter 4 Analysis and Findings 3.1 Introduction This research is conducted based on the information available on the Annual Reports of Marks and Spencer and Next Group as well as on the findings of professional business analysts found on reliable internet sources. In this chapter, the most important section of this study, key findings of companys business performance in light of PESTLE, Five-Forces and SWOT analysis and also the financial performance over last three would be presented. A comparison of performance with Next Group would also appear in this section. 3.2 An Analysis of MSs Business and Performance Summary Business performance of Marks and Spencer can be measured in reference to the factors available in macro-economic environment, factors in apparel and food industry and in terms of companys strengths and weaknesses. The findings of business analysis are presented as following. 3.2.1 Findings from PESTLE Analysis MSs Performance Key factors relevant to Marks and Spencers business found from PESTEL analysis can be summarised as following (table 3.1) Recent political development in United Kingdom is posing threat to many businesses in form of rise in tax rate, cut of social benefit and cap in immigration. There is also setback of recession that had injured the British economy significantly. Despite these negative elements in political and economic environment Marks Spencers revenue has grown at a steady rate over last three years (See Chart 4.1) showing no sign of recessionary impact on its business. Social environment however demonstrate goods signs for clothe and food retailers. Marks and Spencer had introduced various successful brands that meet the changing social pattern and consumer demand. The company is also successful in adopting technologies. Its ecommerce sales have increased at a sizable chunk in last few years. MS has also successfully used consumer research technologies for identifying market demands and customer needs. The retailer has proved it as one of the most energy conscious and environmentally friendly comp any in British history. Marks and Spencer is a century old company and had well adopted itself in the macroeconomic context of United Kingdom. British retail industry is run by a few very big players. In apparel retailing the popular names are Marks and Spencer, Next and Debenham. However, food retailers like Tesco and Asda are trying to get into apparel market with lower prices. However, for completely new businesses it would be very tough to challenge companies like Marks and Spencer which have grown its market share by 4% from 7% to 11% in cloth and general merchandise. The companys market share has also improved by 2% in 2010. However, MS could not maintain its image regarding its relationships with suppliers. Many international pressure groups had criticised its bargaining power on its suppliers. 3.2.2 SWOT Analysis and MSs Performance Marks and Spencer is well capitalising on its strength by adding more clothing brands and stepping foot in international markets. Last year companys international revenue was more than  £900 million with a growth of 5%. The company also have capitalised on ecommerce technology; in 2010 MS Directs revenue grew by 27%. Financial Performance Analysis In this study, Marks and Spencers financial performance have been analysed on four performance areas. These areas were profitability, liquidity, efficiency and leverage. For measuring performance in these areas eleven different ratios had been used. The findings of ratio analysis are presented as following. 3.3.1 Profitability: MS vs. Next Average operating profit of MS and Next is respectively 11% and 15%. Though revenue of both the companies grew over the period, operating profit was steady. However, according to findings Next Group is more profitable than Marks and Spencer. Nexts Return on Capital Employed and Return on Equity are also significantly higher than MS (See Figure 4.3 and 4.4). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Based on the above analysis, the research concludes that Next Group is a highly profitable business by providing extra ordinary return to its equity holders. Liquidity Performances Both the companies liquidity is poor scoring far below standard value of 2:1. Marks and Spencers liquidity is at an alarming level of around 50% capability of paying off its current liabilities. Also, over the year none of the retailers could improve liquidity performance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.3.4 Efficiency Although in profitability and liquidity M S is lagging behind Next, in case of efficiency in receivables, payables and inventory management MS had been showing excellent dexterity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The ratios (Figure 4.6) indicate that, inventories are sold in 23 days by MS and in 40 days by Next after purchase. On the other hand, MS is capable of collecting its receivable assets within eleven days of sales which Next can do in 67 days. Payable days are matched with receivable days. However, though MSs collection from customers is faster, its payment frequency to suppliers is a little slow. This might a sign of efficiency in working capital management. The reason behind MSs extra ordinary efficiency is because of its long experience in British industry. Average Asset Turnover Ratio of MS over the last fours years is below 1.5 which is above 2.0 for Next. The ratio indicates that MS can generate sales of around  £1.34 against  £1 of its assets which, though is not poor, in comparison to Next is pretty ordinary. 3.3.5 Leverage Performances Leverage indicates the use of debt in boosting of equity return. Both Marks and Spencer and Next Group use debt which is reflected in their gearing ratios (See Table 4.7). .From Figure 4.8 it can be easily understood that Next Group a highly geared company in comparison to Marks and Spencer. MSs policy seems to be keeping long-term debt less than 50% in its balance sheet. The leverage ratio better explains why Nexts Return on Equity is very high. Now question is are the companys comfortable with these levels of leverage? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . In managing its leverage MS is again performing poorer than Next. While Nexts average interest cover ratio is 13.45 times, MSs one is only around 6 times. The figures indicate that, MS generate only around  £6 of operating profit for paying  £1 of debt cost. Therefore the leverage ratios indicate that MSs competitor is better managing its leverage with higher interest coverage ratio against higher leverage rate. 3.4 MS Summary of Business and Financial Performance Business Performance Summary Financial Performance Summary Marks Spencers revenue has grown at a steady rate over last three years Introduced various successful brands that meet the changing social pattern and consumer demand. Ecommerce sales have increased at a sizable chunk in last few years. Successfully used consumer research technologies for identifying market demands and customer needs. Most energy conscious and environmentally friendly company in British history. Grew its market share by 4% from 7% to 11% in cloth and general merchandise. Market share has also improved by 2% in 2010 in foods. MS could not maintain its image regarding its relationships with suppliers. International revenue was more than  £900 million with a growth of 5%. The company also have capitalised on ecommerce technology; in 2010 MS Directs revenue grew by 27%. Average operating profit margin is 11% in comparison to 15% of Next; Liquidity performance is very poor; Both current and quick ratios are less than 0.5; Average asset turnover rate is more than 1 in comparison to 1.5 of Next; Inventory, receivables and payables management is highly efficient and better than Next; Moderately levered company while Next is a highly levered one; Interest coverage ratio is healthy; but Next is doing better which shows the rationale behind using more debt by Next Overall financial performance of MS is not satisfactory against its competitor. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Table 4.9: Performance Summary Chapter 5 Conclusion Recommendations 5.1 Introduction In previous section, it has been observed that Marks and Spencers financial performance is not satisfactory in comparison to Next Group. Except the efficiency areas, MS needs to improve itself in profitability, liquidity and leverage. 5.2 Improving Profitability MSs average operating profit margin was only around 11%. It is found that though companys revenue has grown in last three years its profit margin shrank because of increase costs. Marks and Spencer needs to cut its operating costs to match its profitability with the industry. 5.3 Improving Liquidity The companys liquidity is below the alert level which had been persistent over last four years. Although for very large and established companys it is not a big concern. However, in times

A Change Is as Good as a Holiday.

‘’A change is as good as a holiday†¦ really? ’’ According to my personal experience a change is better than a holiday. I changed my life by moving to another country, the UK, where I can create something and develop my life, unlike going on holiday for a short period of time and returning to do the same thing again. During my time in Iraq I enjoyed spending time with my family and I was happy as a clown. However, on April the 9th 2003 USA had a master plan to invade Iraq, as a child I was scared due to my parents clearly being worried; this made me anxious I was so terrified and shaken like an electric tooth brush.It was like I had adrenalin rush, I couldn’t sleep – I was alive with fear. As the army entered the city of Baghdad, Iraq†¦ The sky was red like blazing flames and I could hear the bullets shoot through my ears like thunder. The gun powder rushed into my nose from the chimney from the fire place in the comfort of my own hom e. There were so many reasons why I had left my country with my family, and one of them was the war. However I’ve been through the hard times and I could’ve just stayed. Not knowing what my destiny would be but as a family we made the decision of leaving.We all agreed that if we left Iraq then we could all have a better life and could continue with our education to have the best life possible. Who wants to leave their home town? Obviously it was a struggle and to look back and leave behind everything and everyone I know: The home I grew in for 11 years and the place where my childhood was full with amazing memories. On the way to the airport I felt miserable; I was reluctant to get on the plane. I hesitated to step forward, however a decision has been made and I had no choice apart from getting on the plane as I knew that my dad was at the other end of the journey.The dream came true! My first step out of the plane towards success, I continued walking through the tunne l to see my dad for the first time in a year. I was bursting with joy to see my father; I was pumped with energy full of happiness: I couldn’t express my feelings so I just hugged him, and my heart was finally relieved. The family and I were on the way out of the airport, into to the car that my dad bought which was blue like the Circassian sea, and we were on the way to the house in Neasdon, London. When I was in the car whilst my dad was driving, I was scared; I didn’t know anyone or the language they spoke.The weather was dull; the clouds were grey and the dark streets. It was due to rain my dad said. I couldn’t play the sport I loved; swimming was my favourite sport back home. There was indoor swimming but it wasn’t the same. I couldn’t even go to my own back garden to do anything, and it was full of mud. A week after I arrived it had snowed, for the first time in my life I saw little white flakes falling from the sky, like a blessing from god. I wanted to go out, but I had a cold and I wasn’t even used to this miserable demotivating weather.Back in Iraq it was blazing hot nearly every day of the year. Every day it was a staggering 50 degrees Celsius like the Saharan desert. As I started school I felt the effects of the change, I didn’t know whether it would be for the better or worse; however I knew I was going to achieve something great, and become a role model to inspire my brother as he was young and needed someone to look up to besides my dad. I feel a little safer nowadays due to people being nice, although there are those occasional racist remarks people give.But altogether the people all colours, races and nationalities are not as I expected; there are mixed cultures and religions -they did not shun me they welcomed me to the area and country; even though they did not know where I was from, who I am, or what I do. Till this day the dream of a better life still lives on. Change instead of a holiday ca n be good in some circumstances such as mine. For me my safety was more important so I had to leave. Sometimes freedom and safety are something a holiday can’t give.

Egyptian and Roman Empire Essay

Though there have been many greatly noted civilizations of the ancient world one might see those of the Egyptian and of the Roman Empire as two of the greatest. There were many contributing factors to the success of these two societies as well as there downfalls. One reason the Egyptians was a successful in the ancient world was due to their environment. The main reason for the strength of the early Egyptian society was the Nile. The Nile kept a majority of Egypt’s riverbanks full of lush greenery and plentiful natural resources. The Nile provided fresh water, free transportation, endless agricultural possibilities, as well as trade aspects. In ancient times all people depended on the river for their existence. Egypt flourished for 3,000 years because of the people’s ability to harness the power of the great Nile. The importance of the great river is reflected in ancient Egyptians daily life. It shows through in their art, religion, writing, as well as social lives. The river helped shape their society as well as their existence. Religion also greatly affected the Egyptian society greatly. Their religion was one based upon the central idea of polytheism. Where they believed in a series of many gods and goddesses. Even the Egyptian kings or â€Å"Pharos† as they were called, were even referred to gods on earth. Society and their religion were based mainly upon keeping the gods happy and content. Often times offering them sacrifices and other gifts to keep the Egyptian people free of torment and disaster. Everything in life depended on the gods. From fertility, to the rising of the sun and moon, crops, as well as the great Nile. The gods could be fair or vengeful, or so was the theory of the Egyptians. Thus why they tried to keep them eternally happy. Another powerful if not the strongest civilization of ancient times was the Roman Empire. Much like the Egyptians Rome also focused on location as an ideal place for starting a civilization. Rome was a city protected by hills. It had many great routes in out and out of the city mainly used for trade. Since Rome had such a good defensive standpoint a citizen could feel safe living there. ROMs location also added up to a large amount of cultural diffusion being the center of ancient life during its time. The Roman Empire also used every one of its available resources very well. From natural resources to manmade, they used everything. From The great roman military building roads, for travel and trade, which was a large part of roman life. Romans were also very smart, using great techniques in art, architecture, and labor forms. Ancient Rome was the only place to have running water, sewers, roads, as well as an outstanding military. But they also had a people’s republic, which gave the citizen an actual voice in society. Rome also took advantage of war. With every war came more slave labor, be to used in any way shape or form that they desired. Thus making Rome the most civilized as well as the least civilized of its time.

Students Are Key Contributors With Their Standardized...

Students are key contributors with their standardized tests score. Their score will determine graduation and school ratings. On the elemental level, the student does not always comprehend the value or importance of their education. Therefore, it is the teacher’s role that is the leading pieces at this level. The students perspective can be influenced by other factors such as peers. Over the years, the teachers puzzle will become less and the students piece more as the student shows growth in understanding their role in their education. While there are other pieces to contribute such as administrators, parents, and the community, the chapters focus on the key roles of the student and teacher. Elementary students have been considered sponges such that they should be open to learning and have some kind of mindset that school is considered good. However, over the years the demographics have changed such that number of students have increased along with diversity, povert y schools, and types of educational needs. This change the idea of education being good to other issues on campus such as healthcare, and physical and intellectual development which can multiply over the years. Students are overlooked as key participants in teaching learning initiatives and leads to the belief that it is the teacher’s sole responsibility for better outcomes. As students become aware of their individual educational importance they should begin to take more value andShow MoreRelatedAmerica Needs The American Education System1392 Words   |  6 PagesInternational Student Assessment in December of 2010, many in the government and community are searching for ways to reform the American education system to give American students a greater opportunity to succeed. According to the report, one cannot ignore the fact that American students are not testing as high academically as other nations in the world. There are many contributing elements that have brought Americ a to her knees in the education system, however, the obsession with standardized testingRead MoreEssay about Should American Schools Remove Standarized Tests?1245 Words   |  5 Pages Since the release of the annual report by Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) in December of 2010, many in the government and community are searching for ways to reform the American education system to give American students a greater opportunity to succeed. According to the report, one cannot ignore the fact that American students are not testing as high academically as other nations in the world (Duncan, 2010). There are many contributing elements that have brought America toRead MorePersuasive Essay On Standardized Testing1316 Words   |  6 Pagessome teenagers, to imagine the idea of more tests on top of the already rigorous schoolwork. Early on Saturday mornings, one can see the procession of kids entering high schools across the country to put themselves through five hours of gruelling testing. All of this nightmarish workload is completed just for the opportunity to attend a college of some recognition and ultimately gain a job in the workforce.   Ã‚  Ã‚   I think it can be agreed by all students that nobody enjoys the ludicrous amount of extraRead MoreThe Education Of The United States928 Words   |  4 Pages engineering, and math) programs and standardized education, the government is attempting to reverse declining test scores and prepare American youth for a globally competitive and more technology-based future. Proponents of a STEM education assert that scientific thinking and technical skills are what are needed in a modern economy, while a liberal education is often an unnecessary commodity. The purpose behind standardized schooling is to give every student the tools to succeed, usually at theRead MoreTeaching And Methods Of Teaching Essay2222 Words   |  9 Pagesonly supports the fact that creativity can be taught, but it also proves that creativity can be shown—or not shown— on varying levels depending on the method of teaching being used. Unfortunately, current methods of teaching and the need f or the students to meet state standards is leading to the phenomenon known as, the â€Å"creativity crisis,† thus meaning that creativity in the United States is on the decline. In order to regain control of our nation’s creativity levels, we must start with our gradeRead MoreThe Nutrition And Academic Performance1790 Words   |  8 PagesNutrition and Academic Performance Generations have change yet the expectations of overprotective parents are higher than ever. Most parents expect that school systems help create children that are confident and prepare students for high school graduation. At the same time, is important that children learn the required skills and knowledge needed to prevail in college, professional careers, and personal life (Common Core State Standards Initiative 2015). In addition, school systems should alsoRead MoreNo Child Left Behind2277 Words   |  10 Pagespublished on its effects, which demonstrates the impact and debate generated by this law. The major goals of this bipartisan legislation were to improve student performance through standardized testing by using data from annual test scores to measure each students’ and schools’ progress; to close the achievement gap between disadvantaged students and their better-off counterparts; and to hold teachers and schools accountable. All these actions were to be carried out in order to improve educationalRead MoreThe Philosophy Of Education Is Its Differing Aims1536 Words   |  7 Pagesseeks to diffuse students with the essentials of academic understanding and character growth. Simply, Essentialism provides a conventional or a â€Å"back to the basics† approach towards education, where educators fixate laboriously on achievement test scores as a factor of the evaluating advancement (Gutek, 2004, p. 263, p. 267-268). Furthermore, Essentialism concentrates on the core knowledge that will address long-established moral beliefs and intellectual knowledge that students need to become informedRead MoreThe Achievement Gap Is Difficult For Children2292 Words   |  10 Pagesgap is an aperture of educational measures between the performance of groups of students, especially groups defined by socioeconomic status, ethnicity and gender† (Valerie, http://www.teachability.com/). The imbalance in test scores is a key factor in closing the gap. Presently minority students score lower than European Americans on grammar, pronunciation, literacy and mathematics test on graded test work and on test that measure scholastic aptitude and intelligence. Not only is there a gapRead MoreThe Achievement Gap Is Difficult For Children2305 Words   |  10 Pagesgap is an aperture of educational measures between the performance of groups of students, especially groups defined by socioeconomic status, ethnicity and gender (Valerie, http://www.teachability.com/). The imbalance in test scores is a key factor in closing the gap. Presently minority students score lower than European Americans on grammar, pronunciation, literacy and mathematics test on graded test work and on test that measure scholastic aptitude and intelligence. Not only is there a gap